1

gaussian process regression tutorial

follow up post Link to the full IPython notebook file, # 1D simulation of the Brownian motion process, # Simulate the brownian motions in a 1D space by cumulatively, # Move randomly from current location to N(0, delta_t), 'Position over time for 5 independent realizations', # Illustrate covariance matrix and function, # Show covariance matrix example from exponentiated quadratic, # Sample from the Gaussian process distribution. We can treat the Gaussian process as a prior defined by the kernel function and create a posterior distribution given some data. Although $\bar{\mathbf{f}}_*$ and $\text{cov}(\mathbf{f}_*)$ look nasty, they follow the the standard form for the mean and covariance of a conditional Gaussian distribution, and can be derived relatively straightforwardly (see here). (also known as Away from the observations the data lose their influence on the prior and the variance of the function values increases. $$\mathbf{f}_* | X_*, X, \mathbf{y} \sim \mathcal{N}\left(\bar{\mathbf{f}}_*, \text{cov}(\mathbf{f}_*)\right),$$, where We recently ran into these approaches in our robotics project that having multiple robots to generate environment models with minimum number of samples. """, # Fill the cost matrix for each combination of weights, Calculate the posterior mean and covariance matrix for y2. This post at This tutorial introduces the reader to Gaussian process regression as an expressive tool to model, actively explore and exploit unknown functions. Guassian Process and Gaussian Mixture Model This document acts as a tutorial on Gaussian Process(GP), Gaussian Mixture Model, Expectation Maximization Algorithm. By choosing a specific kernel function $k$ it is possible to set The Gaussian Processes Classifier is a classification machine learning algorithm. method below. Gaussian Processes are a generalization of the Gaussian probability distribution and can be used as the basis for sophisticated non-parametric machine learning algorithms for classification and regression. The red cross marks the position of $\pmb{\theta}_{MAP}$ for our G.P with fixed noised variance of $10^{-8}$. \Sigma_{12} & = k(X_1,X_2) = k_{21}^\top \quad (n_1 \times n_2) Instead we use the simple vectorized form $K(X1, X2) = \sigma_f^2X_1X_2^T$ for the linear kernel, and numpy's optimized methods $\texttt{pdist}$ and $\texttt{cdist}$ for the squared exponential and periodic kernels. Luckily, Bayes' theorem provides us a principled way to pick the optimal parameters. $z$ has the desired distribution since $\mathbb{E}[\mathbf{z}] = \mathbf{m} + L\mathbb{E}[\mathbf{u}] = \mathbf{m}$ and $\text{cov}[\mathbf{z}] = L\mathbb{E}[\mathbf{u}\mathbf{u}^T]L^T = LL^T = K$. For example, the f.d.d over $\mathbf{f} = (f_{\mathbf{x}_1}, \dots f_{\mathbf{x}_n})$ would be $\mathbf{f} \sim \mathcal{N}(\bar{\mathbf{f}}, K(X, X))$, with. This is common practice and isn't as much of a restriction as it sounds, since the mean of the posterior distribution is free to change depending on the observations it is conditioned on (see below). \end{align*}. \Sigma_{22} & = k(X_2,X_2) \quad (n_2 \times n_2) \\ \mu_{1} & = m(X_1) \quad (n_1 \times 1) \\ In this post we will model the covariance with the In our case the index set $\mathcal{S} = \mathcal{X}$ is the set of all possible input points $\mathbf{x}$, and the random variables $z_s$ are the function values $f_\mathbf{x} \overset{\Delta}{=} f(\mathbf{x})$ corresponding to all possible input points $\mathbf{x} \in \mathcal{X}$. Tutorial: Gaussian Process Regression This tutorial will give you more hands-on experience working with Gaussian process regres-sion and kernel functions. Try setting different initial value of theta.'. without any observed data. The additional term $\sigma_n^2I$ is due to the fact that our observations are assumed noisy as mentioned above. Terms involving the matrix inversion $\left[K(X, X) + \sigma_n^2\right]^{-1}$ are handled using the Cholesky factorization of the positive definite matrix $[K(X, X) + \sigma_n^2] = L L^T$. We can see that there is another local maximum if we allow the noise to vary, at around $\pmb{\theta}=\{1.35, 10^{-4}\}$. $$\lvert K(X, X) + \sigma_n^2 \lvert = \lvert L L^T \lvert = \prod_{i=1}^n L_{ii}^2 \quad \text{or} \quad \text{log}\lvert{K(X, X) + \sigma_n^2}\lvert = 2 \sum_i^n \text{log}L_{ii}$$ \textit{Periodic}: \quad &k(\mathbf{x}_i, \mathbf{x}_j) = \text{exp}\left(-\sin(2\pi f(\mathbf{x}_i - \mathbf{x}_j))^T \sin(2\pi f(\mathbf{x}_i - \mathbf{x}_j))\right) What we will end up with is a simple GPR class to perform regression with, and hopefully a better understanding of what GPR is all about! In particular we first pre-compute the quantities $\mathbf{\alpha} = \left[K(X, X) + \sigma_n^2\right]^{-1}\mathbf{y} = L^T \backslash(L \backslash \mathbf{y})$ and $\mathbf{v} = L^T [K(X, X) + \sigma_n^2]^{-1}K(X, X_*) = L \backslash K(X, X_*)$, This tutorial introduces the reader to Gaussian process regression as an expressive tool to model, actively explore and exploit unknown functions. Rather, we are able to represent $f(\mathbf{x})$ in a more general and flexible way, such that the data can have more influence on its exact form. m(\mathbf{x}) &= \mathbb{E}[f(\mathbf{x})] \\ covariance function Of course the reliability of our predictions is dependent on a judicious choice of kernel function. Here is a skelton structure of the GPR class we are going to build. To conclude we've implemented a Gaussian process and illustrated how to make predictions using it's posterior distribution. 9 minute read. Of course there is no guarantee that we've found the global maximum. typically describe systems randomly changing over time. symmetric This post is part of series on Gaussian processes: In what follows we assume familiarity with basic probability and linear algebra especially in the context of multivariate Gaussian distributions. . In other words, we can fit the data just as well (in fact better) if we increase the length scale but also increase the noise variance i.e. We simulate 5 different paths of brownian motion in the following figure, each path is illustrated with a different color. You can prove for yourself that each of these kernel functions is valid i.e. . The term marginal refers to the marginalisation over the function values $\mathbf{f}$. Enough mathematical detail to fully understand how they work. Rather than claiming relates to some speciﬁc models (e.g. \end{align*} In particular, we are interested in the multivariate case of this distribution, where each random variable is distributed normally and their joint distribution is also Gaussian. Using the marginalisation property of multivariate Gaussians, the joint distribution over the observations, $\mathbf{y}$, and test outputs $\mathbf{f_*}$ according to the GP prior is We can get get a feel for the positions of any other local maxima that may exist by plotting the contours of the log marginal likelihood as a function of $\pmb{\theta}$. There are some great resources out there to learn about them - Rasmussen and Williams, mathematicalmonk's youtube series, Mark Ebden's high level introduction and scikit-learn's implementations - but no single resource I found providing: This post aims to fix that by drawing the best bits from each of the resources mentioned above, but filling in the gaps, and structuring, explaining and implementing it all in a way that I think makes most sense. This might not mean much at this moment so lets dig a bit deeper in its meaning. Now we know what a GP is, we'll now explore how they can be used to solve regression tasks. The f.d.d of the observations $\mathbf{y} \sim \mathbb{R}^n$ defined under the GP prior is: Updated Version: 2019/09/21 (Extension + Minor Corrections). We can make predictions from noisy observations $f(X_1) = \mathbf{y}_1 + \epsilon$, by modelling the noise $\epsilon$ as Gaussian noise with variance $\sigma_\epsilon^2$. ), a Gaussian process can represent obliquely, but rigorously, by letting the data ‘speak’ more clearly for themselves. We want to make predictions $\mathbf{y}_2 = f(X_2)$ for $n_2$ new samples, and we want to make these predictions based on our Gaussian process prior and $n_1$ previously observed data points $(X_1,\mathbf{y}_1)$. We can however sample function evaluations $\mathbf{y}$ of a function $f$ drawn from a Gaussian process at a finite, but arbitrary, set of points $X$: $\mathbf{y} = f(X)$. ⁽²⁾ By Bayes' theorem, the posterior distribution over the kernel parameters $\pmb{\theta}$ is given by: $$p(\pmb{\theta}|\mathbf{y}, X) = \frac{p(\mathbf{y}|X, \pmb{\theta}) p(\pmb{\theta})}{p(\mathbf{y}|X)}.$$. The non-linearity is because the kernel can be interpreted as implicitly computing the inner product in a different space than the original input space (e.g. We assume that each observation $y$ can be related to an underlying function $f(\mathbf{x})$ through a Gaussian noise model: $$y = f(\mathbf{x}) + \mathcal{N}(0, \sigma_n^2)$$. Have a look at The Gaussian process posterior is implemented in the Consistency: If the GP speciﬁes y(1),y(2) ∼ N(µ,Σ), then it must also specify y(1) ∼ N(µ 1,Σ 11): A GP is completely speciﬁed by a mean function and a \textit{Linear}: \quad &k(\mathbf{x}_i, \mathbf{x}_j) = \sigma_f^2\mathbf{x}_i^T \mathbf{x}_j \\ Instead, at inference time we would integrate over all possible values of $\pmb{\theta}$ allowed under $p(\pmb{\theta}|\mathbf{y}, X)$. Here our Cholesky factorisation $[K(X, X) + \sigma_n^2] = L L^T$ comes in handy again: Rather than claiming relates to some speciﬁc models (e.g. This post aims to present the essentials of GPs without going too far down the various rabbit holes into which they can lead you (e.g. In non-parametric methods, … where a particle moves around in the fluid due to other particles randomly bumping into it. Next we compute the Cholesky decomposition of $K(X_*, X_*)=LL^T$ (possible since $K(X_*, X_*)$ is symmetric positive semi-definite). Given any set of N points in the desired domain of your functions, take a multivariate Gaussian whose covariance matrix parameter is the Gram matrix of your N points with some desired kernel, and sample from that Gaussian. We will build up deeper understanding on how to implement Gaussian process regression from scratch on a toy example. Gaussian process history Prediction with GPs: • Time series: Wiener, Kolmogorov 1940’s • Geostatistics: kriging 1970’s — naturally only two or three dimensional input spaces • Spatial statistics in general: see Cressie [1993] for overview • General regression: O’Hagan [1978] • Computer experiments (noise free): Sacks et al. Perhaps the most important attribute of the GPR class is the $\texttt{kernel}$ attribute. The main advantages of this method are the ability of GPs to provide uncertainty estimates and to learn the noise and smoothness parameters from training data. Instead we specify the GP in terms of an element-wise mean function $m:\mathbb{R}^D \mapsto \mathbb{R}$ and an element-wise covariance function (a.k.a kernel function) $k: \mathbb{R}^{D \times D} \mapsto \mathbb{R}$: conditional distribution that they construct symmetric positive semi-definite covariance matrices. For example, the covariance matrix associated with the linear kernel is simply $\sigma_f^2XX^T$, which is indeed symmetric positive semi-definite. Notice in the figure above that the stochastic process can lead to different paths, also known as . You can read You will explore how setting the hyperparameters determines the behavior of the radial basis function and gain more insight into the expressibility of kernel functions and their construction. Gaussian Processes for regression: a tutorial José Melo Faculty of Engineering, University of Porto FEUP - Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering Rua Dr. Roberto Frias, s/n 4200-465 Porto, PORTUGAL jose.melo@fe.up.pt Abstract Gaussian processes are a powerful, non-parametric tool that can be be used in supervised learning, namely in re- \vdots & \ddots & \vdots \\ In other words we need to form the GP posterior. But how do we choose the basis functions? \mu_{2} & = m(X_2) \quad (n_2 \times 1) \\